Saturday, June 24, 2017

Your silence IS a weakness

You made the statement that I should not interpret your silence as a weakness. The fact that I did not contact you during the period from 2011 to 2016 was that I was aware that you were lurking as I was monitoring your visits to my website. I was just continuing my research into your antics and posting what I found to the Internet. So you weren't so silent as saw your interest in what I was saying.

I agree with Anthony Mannella that there was very little to be found about your dubious businesses on the Internet and that it could be concluded that I was the only one with a problem with you. I counter that with the statement that nobody else had the balls to call you out on what you have been up to over the years. What continues to puzzle me is why? I certainly have come across others that seem to have fallen victim to your devious ways, and some of them have communicated with me about you. In most cases they are not comfortable in making a statement against you. Or perhaps they are not in a position to do so and fear what you would do if they did?

I really cannot fathom what makes a person like you tick. All I did was make an innocent comment about a data recovery service that I thought was a little optimistic and then here we are 6 years later and you cannot get over it! While it is true that neither can I, but in some ways I am enjoying all this. I don't know what motivated someone to register domain names in those of people they want to discredit and then to post a whole load of irrelevant nonsense on them. Much of the content is made-up and by the single nature of its presentation it is clear to anyone finding it that you are pretty much just a "One Trick Pony".

By the way, how is the correspondence with the Suffolk churches going? I would be very interested in seeing some of the replies. Perhaps you can publish some of them to your websites about me? In the absence of any real ones you could always make some up!

As far as my interest in matters regarding security and privacy, I guess you have a point that it could be seen as a way of creating a "smoke-screen" to deflect interest from the other misdeeds that I may be perpetrating. The only problem with that is there are none. My interest is genuine and is a commentary on the nonsense that I see reported in the press. My point about the "One-Trick-Pony" serves to illustrate that there are any topics that are of interest to me as anyone who visits my sites will see. It is not ALL about you!

Why is Laura Kuenssberg so negative?

Also is her commentary just her view or the official one of the BBC? I get that she thinks that the Nation made the wrong decision to left the EU but she can't seem to get over the fact that a choice has been made.

Nothing that comes out of Brussels is reported in a good light by her. It is all "uncertainty" and that there are sooooo many unanswered questions. I put it to you that no matter what outcome that is decided by the 27 she will dismiss it with I told you it was a bad move on Britain's part.

It is not that she is a woman as the New Statesman article want to make out. I don't mind that she is overtly biased politically against the Labour party. However, it is amusing that it is the Conservatives, namely Theresa May, that is the one that comes in for major criticism by Laura. There must be others that find her objectionable, those that are not misogynists, her sex and sexual orientation are not my point here.

I see that the New Statesman article was dated before the UK referendum, I think that now she is showing her true colours and it runs far deeper than anti-Corbyn sentiment. Before the referendum result I was pretty much neutral in my opinion about Laura Kuenssberg, but when the morning after came she was far from sanguine  about having to go over to parliament to report on the vote. She was pretty terse when she was asked about the situation by Huw Edwards and what she was going to next.

I didn't even bother reading the David Babbs article in 38 Degrees, there are many platforms for the kind of nonsense that is foisted on women by men, and vise versa, the case of Hillary and Donald is a case in point. She wasn't defeated because she was a woman and it being misogyny - the electorate just didn't like her!

Actually, discussing this with my partner, she tells me that I was pretty anti-Laura in the lead-up to the referendum. Again that was not that she was a woman it was because she was a stanch "Remainer". As I seem to recall Jeremy was sitting on the fence at that point, it was only after Theresa announced a general election that he "toed the line" and said that he would take the UK out of the EU - that is because that the majority of those that voted leave were Labour voters.

Friday, June 23, 2017

Being paranoid that someone is posting things about you

It must be really annoying if you are worried that there is someone posting the truth about your actions online. You would have to check on a daily basis to see if there are any new posts. Better still you could retrieve a list of  all the posts made that year, as in.technology-muse.blogspot.com/2017/
If you do this you will see that there are posts almost every day on a wide range of topics. The fact that there are some about you must be confusing as this blog is not about you. You may have not liked some of the things that I have said about you, the feeling is mutual, but all that I have posted is purely my observations and an account of my dealings with you. I have not made anything up, unlike you.

I would never have guessed that a simple post about a data recovery service that I thought was a little optimistic in its promises would have sparked an exchange of insults that has endured for 6 years.

At the time of my first post I was relatively new to blogging and my post about a "product" that I had seen for sale in Canada Computers was just a curiosity to me. I have little or no reason to be interested in you. As you have stated I have never done any business with you but you are inconsistent in that you now claim that I sent a HDD to you to have recovered and you also claim to have found "disturbing images" on that drive. If I have never done business with you, how can this be?

However, in making such a claim I am now very much interested in you. Judging by the other things that you have done to me and others I feel that it is my civic duty to report these acts. Quite frankly I fine you quite pathetic and there is no real reason that I should spend as much time as I do on your case. Again, as you say, I must have a lot of time on my hands - well this is true, and besides I enjoy winding you up as you deserve it.

Communicating with others that you have messed with I am pretty certain that I am correct in my assessment of you. Perhaps I have been the only one to successfully challenge you on your bullshit. Sadly, Wayne Morris Brown is not a worthy adversary for you and you seem to have well and truly "screwed him over". People such as Joshua Sham, Terry Bradshaw and even Anthony Mannella probably wish that they never had any dealings with you.

Thursday, June 22, 2017

The Council Houses

Okay, I should really be calling them Affordable Housing. I am not sure if I would want to live here if I had to be near them. There is a section of the village where these exist, but they are on the other side of the Hall, we are not really in the village but next to the Hall and parish church.

It is like there are two worlds here. A definite division between the "haves" and the "have-nots". Although this doesn't seem to be the case with car ownership, quantity that is, the value is far less. Admittedly this is exacerbated by the lack of off-street parking but for a street where there is little space to start with it is difficult to navigate. This really is no different than all the roads around here.

The reason I was there was that I was cleaning up the bus shelter and inspecting the telephone box, which the parish council now own. The shelter was getting a little overgrown and the clerk had received a complaint. I decided to give it a good clean-out while the Village Hall Committee meeting  was in session.

The locals that I did see seemed to be a little bemused why I was doing what I was doing. "Aren't the Council responsible for that?" I guess that was what triggered the title of this post.

Wednesday, June 21, 2017

Information for CRA

Part of an email I received 28th November 2016

Again the highlighted text is part of the email:

As I mentioned, we have a substantial amount of information collected regarding Wayne's 'dubious business' :) practices over the years. This has not been submitted to the CRA yet, but with the tax season around the corner, I will ensure it is. It is frustrating to me that Wayne continues to get away with his crimes. I hope that CRA involvement will have an impact... However you decide to proceed, I thank you for your past efforts. I do check in or your site once in a while to see if there is anything new posted. This has helped us to add to the information we have collected over the years.

..... and there is nobody else that has a problem with him?!

Of course, Wayne will just claim that this is just me inventing "inflammatory" and falsified information again!

Wayne McAlpine continues to be interested in what I post about him. He thinks that I have an interest in the automotive industry - I don't.